Japan Takes Lead in GHG Emission Reduction in the UN’s Climate Change Summit

Wednesday, September 23, 2009 – Osaka, Japan

Mr. Hatoyama, the new Japanese Prime Minister, made a speech pledging Japan’s mid-term target of 25% GHG (global greenhouse gas = CO2) emission reduction vs.1990 by 2020 at the United Nation’s Climate Change Summit held on September 22 in New York, his debut to the diplomatic setting. He also advocated his initiative of providing to developing and emerging countries Japan’s energy saving technologies and capital aid to help them drive global warming countermeasures. His speech in English won great applause and appreciation in the summit, and it is probably the first time that a speech made by a Japanese Prime Minister won such an applause. However, his aggressive target has not been provoking positive reactions back in Japan.

1. Facts On GHG Emission Reduction Mid-Term Target

Mid-term target of reducing GHG emission is the primary focus of the negotiation among participant countries on post Kyoto Protocol (COP3) after 2013, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change / UNFCCC, FCCC. The deadline of the negotiation is COP15 United Nations Climate Change Conference Copenhagen 2009 to be held in Denmark this year.

2. Background of Prime Minister Mr. Hatoyama’s Speech

The target set by the former Prime Minister, Mr. Aso, was 15% reduction vs.2005 (8% reduction vs. 1990); therefore, it is evident that Mr. Hatoyama’s target is extremely aggressive (equivalent to 30% reduction vs. 2005). He had set this target as his policy, mentioned in his speeches in Tokyo earlier this month, and announced to Japanese media on 20th this month, although he may well have been aware that there would be resistances from Japan domestic (industries and economy opinion leaders). His intention is to take the initiative in the upcoming international negotiation settings by advocating aggressive target and supporting measures in his debut diplomacy setting in his own words. (First policy he set was taking the initiative from bureaucrats in making speeches at press conferences etc. so that politicians will be delivering their message in their own words). Such a “performance” in the international community conference symbolizes and delivers strong message on the change in political administration and of his style of politics, which is “politician taking the initiative”.

- 25% Reduction of CO2, Message to be Delivered in Upcoming Diplomatic Settings by Prime Minister Mr.Hatoyama
http://megoyanagi.blogspot.com/2009/09/new-japanese-government-officially.html

- How Japanese Government to Develop New Information Disclosure System with Media, Achieving Objectives & Promoting Interactive Communication with Media
http://megoyanagi.blogspot.com/2009/09/how-japanese-government-ti-develop-new.html

The new target announced is the most aggressive among all participant countries, as is shown from the table below. (Source: September 23 Japanese article from Nikkei, Japan’s leading newspaper specialized in economy and politics; translated by the author).

GHG Emission Reduction Target by 2020 of Developed Countries
(The reason that some target is not specific is that the target is specified under specific condition such as “in the case which other countries advocate sufficient reduction target”)

Country Name / Reduction Rate (%) / Standard Year / Availability of Purchasing Emission Quotas
Japan / 25 / 1990 / yes
The U.S. / 14 / 2005 -
EU / 20 - 30 / 1990 / yes
Canada / 20 / 2006 / -
Russia / 10 - 15 / 1990 / -
Switzerland / 20 - 30 / 1990 / yes
Australia / 5 - 25 / 2000 / yes
* Composed by Nikkei based on documents on framework of the U.N. climate change agreement owned by the agreement offices

3. How Mr. Hatoyama Was Careful In Making His Speech

Prime Minister Mr. Hatoyama was careful in making his speech, not forgetting to be considerate in presenting such an aggressive target. His speech included concrete measures compared with his previous speeches made in Tokyo, Japan, but he deliberately made the expression regarding “reduction compared with which year“ not to be too specific, using the expression such as “if I would state comparing with 1990” instead of “vs. 1990”, taking into consideration of the U.S. who had set the 2005 as the standard year in setting the target. He also was careful to avoid misunderstanding from other countries that Japan is prominent in presenting such an aggressive target. He did so by encouraging major GHG emission countries including the U.S., China and India to actively join in his initiative, advocating his Hatoyama initiatives including the principles below.

Hatoyama Initiatives
1) Public and private sectors of developed countries will contribute to additional capital aid.
2) Rules for measuring the effectiveness of aid will be developed.
3) Co-existence of capital aid and preservation of intellectual property right will be fulfilled.

4. Positive Reactions From The International Community

The speech was highly evaluated, with positive comments from participants. The overall reaction from the international community is positive from each standpoint.

The U.S. gave positive reaction backed up by President Obama’s positive speech in the summit, who said that countermeasure for global warming is the U.S. focus and is resolved to take actions. Regarding the reduction target he emphasized that both developed and developing countries need to take responsibility to achieve the target. He also showed his intention of reaching international consensus on this issue at CPO15 to be held in December in Copenhagen, Denmark. He advocated the need of making consensus among all countries including emerging countries, stating hat the only solution is all major countries collaborate to take measures, while developing countries (that had been emitting global warming gasses) have responsibilities to initiate the discussion.

EU evaluated the Japanese aggressive target. EU had been positive in activating trading CO2 emission quotas among countries with the objective of reducing CO2 emission globally, and therefore they would like to deepen collaboration with Japan and lead debate on this issue in the international community. Mr. Okada, the new Minister of Foreign Affairs, had meetings with Ministers of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, the current chairperson of EU, and Spain. The EU side agreed on the importance of solving climate change issue and highly evaluated Japan’s mid-term target of 25% reduction of CO2 emission vs.1990. In addition, the Minister of Climate Change and Energy of Denmark also evaluated the aggressive target of Japan.

Reactions from developing and emerging countries are subtle but not negative at all. Emerging countries including China and India have been strengthening initiatives to reduce global warming gasses in individual sectors such as generation of electricity. One point to note is that their consistent stance is that it is the developed countries responsible for the past global warming that should commit to the aggressive reduction target to be achieved by 2020.

5. Negative Reactions from Japan Domestic Opinion Leaders

It is true that aggressive target has been triggering technological innovation and creation of new industry and employment, but the reaction from Japan so far has been rather negative. This is because Mr. Hatoyama has not yet sufficiently explained to industries and related opinion leaders that are to bear the burden in accomplishing the target. Another reason is that whether emerging countries such as China would really participate in this international initiative of GHG emission reduction is still under question.

To achieve the target, industries would need to reduce 20-30% GHG emission from manufacturing plants, which would be a big burden. It is possible that industries whose GHG emission is large such as iron and steel would be forced to reduce its production, which could lead to drastic production shift from Japan to overseas. And if sufficient CO2 emission reduction is not achieved, they would need to purchase GHG emission quotas from overseas. This is estimated to cost more than 1 trillion yen, according to a government official.

Reaction from economy and commerce associations is quite negative because the target would clearly mean increase in cost. There have been critical comments, requesting the new government to set target taking into consideration both fairness among the international community and reasonability of Japanese citizen’s burden. In fact, there are series of evidences that many Japanese industries/companies are still suffering from high cost and are negatively impacted by new government’s policy, so it is more than natural that the industry and other opinion leaders would react negatively. The break even point of many manufacturing companies has been deteriorating drastically which means that their cost competitiveness under current circumstances is tough. And the recent stock pricing trend of Japan imply that Japanese companies are already negatively impacted by new government’s policy, and it is natural that they would give negative reaction.

- Drastic Deterioration in Break Even Point Ratio of Japanese Manufacturers May Well Indicate Further Tough Job Market in Japan
http://megoyanagi.blogspot.com/2009/09/drastic-deterioration-in-break-even.html

- New Coalition Government Policy, High Yen and Supply & Demand Oppressing Japanese Companies, Being Behind Worldwide Stock Prices Trend
http://megoyanagi.blogspot.com/2009/09/new-coalition-government-policy-high.html

6. Upcoming Challenges For The New Hatoyama Administration To Overcome

Having succeeded in debut the highest-level international conference advocating an aggressive target, a practical “international commitment”, Prime Minister Hatoyama needs to tackle tough challenges upon returning to Japan. He would need to minimize domestic resistances, and draft and execute action plans to achieve the target, taking initiative of post COP3 debate in the international community.

Achieving the target is not easy even if the international community’s reaction is positive, because even internationally, the entire environment is quite tough. It was when Mr. Obama changed the U.S. policy on this issue of proactively reducing GHG emission to cooperate and make harmony with the international community that the international negotiation for GHG emission reduction started to drive. However, Mr. Obama also has health care reform issue to handle and the U.S. Diet is now focusing on this issue, so the deliberation in the Diet of bill regarding GHG is behind schedule. If there is no concrete progress in the G20 summit started 24th this month, it is quite possible that the targeted consensus to be made in December becomes rather difficult.

The feasibility of capital aid execution by developed countries is still a question. EU would like to make consensus of reduction target leveraging capital aid of a tens of billions of dollars. However, discussions among developed countries, that are to raise funds for the capital aid, are still ongoing, far behind the original timeline.

And, even if Mr. Hatoyama manages to convince Japanese industries, related associations, opinion leaders and citizens, the hurdle is still quite high. According to the estimation developed during the former Aso administration, it is vital to increase the solar cell implementation by 5500% (55 times the current implementation) and shift 90% of new car sales to EV cars in order to achieve 25% reduction in GHG emission vs.1990.

Achieving an extremely aggressive target would require something very drastic, some kind of breakthrough. It is passive and conservative target that people tend to agree to easily but they are usually not so much energized by such target, not coming up with innovative ideas, thus often failing to achieve the target. But history teaches us that although at first people are negative at first because it seems absolutely unrealistic, they finally agree and support extremely aggressive target set under tough environment. Such a target delivered by a leader with passion energizes and wins support from followers and related stakeholders. They will then get united to exert maximum effort, leading to creation of innovation and break through, and as a result being successful in achieving the target.

Reduction in GHG emission is an issue that each one of us on this planet is required to take action for the sustainability of human kind, and it is possible to convert this issue to business opportunities as well. It has potential to drive innovations and creation of new industry and employment, meaning growth in world economy and sustainable growth. It is highly hoped that the international community and all stakeholders in each country come in consensus and take their own responsibility to achieve their respective goal.


* The information on the summit is based on series of articles in Nikkei, Japanese leading newspaper specialized in economy and politics, dated September 23, 2009.