Sunday, January 17, 2010 – Osaka, Japan
Nikkei, Japan’s leading newspaper specialized in economy/business and politics, reported January 13 through 15 2009 that long-discussed turnaround of JAL (Japan Air Line) is finally to start. On condition that Corporate Reorganization Act is to be adopted, hurdles to accept support from public institution of “Company Turnaround Aid Institution” have been finally overcome, and the new CEO is appointed. JAL, which had tried to reinvent before in vain, will try again with full support from the government as its last chance.
1. What has been happening until now？
JAL’s turnaround has been under discussion for a long time and it was decided to be done under the Japanese government’s control as explained in the previous article JAL to be GM of Japan – Turnaround under Government’s Control. However, stakeholders (financial institutions, government, JAL employees retired and currently working, etc.) could not come to a consensus the methodology of the turnaround, especially financing, and revision of turnaround plan and negotiation had been ongoing even after the policy of government’s interference was announced on October 24.
2. What had been the hurdles to proceed with the turnaround?
In short, there were the following 4 topics that had been under discussion.
1) What the framework of turnaround methodology to be?
There are a number of methodologies of turnaround of a company, including usage of Chapter 11 equivalent law/Corporate Reorganization Act, or other options, which would determine action plan. It took a while to finalize this point.
Stakeholders finally agreed to adopt Corporate Reorganization Act, which is to be the perquisite to gain support from public institution of “Company Turnaround Aid Institution”.
2) Which turnaround strategy/option to adopt?
3 turnaround strategies/options were proposed, each with different amount or capital needed for turnaround depending on the degree and details of restructuring. The biggest issue under discussion was review of unprofitable international flights. The most drastic option was integrating international flight with ANA (All Nippon Airways), which required minimum capital investment for turnaround.
JAL having been the primary international flight company of Japan, the most drastic option was neglected and was agreed to minimize investment for turnaround by improving cost structure with measures including cutting some affiliates, flights, jobs and pensions, and replacing half the jumbo jet engine airplanes with smaller, more energy-saving airplanes.
3) Will employees, retired and currently working, agree to reduction in pension benefit?
Reduction in pension has been another hot topic for discussion. Reserved amount of JAL’s corporate pension (including post-receipt of retirement allowance by installation, interest rate much higher than average bank interest rate) is insufficient by approximately 450 billion yen at present, and has been requesting 15,700 employees and 8,900 retired employees to accept reduction in pension. If they agree to accept the reduction, the reduction of pension benefit would be 30% in average for retired employees and 50% in average for current employees. And if two-thirds or more of them do not agree, the pension system could not be revised and the reduction of pension benefit would be much greater.
Despite the critical management situation of the company, many retired employees in particular were reluctant to agree to reduction in pension benefit. This probably attributes mainly to their old, conservative mindset, believing that JAL will never go bankrupt, cannot forget the good old days of JAL and not really aware of the hard reality of today’s struggling JAL, and also how corporate pension is managed. Since corporate pension includes retirement benefit to be paid by installation, reduction in corporate pension means reduction in retirement allowance, and retired employees may well need to drastically change their family financing plan.
Employees currently working accepted the reduction relatively straightforwardly, then they made maximum efforts in persuading the retired employees to accept the reduction until the last minutes of deadline of January 11. They finally managed to win the minimum two-thirds of agreement.
4) How to overcome financing and avoid shortage of working capital?
To overcome financing (i.e. avoiding shortage of working capital), the government asked financial institutions to write-off the debts similarly to previous turnarounds initiated by IRCJ (Industrial Revitalization Corporation of Japan) and to assist in bridge financing. It was natural for the financial institutions not to easily agree on this point when the satisfactory turnaround plan had not been presented to them.
On January 12, the 3 major financial institutions (The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Mizuho Corporate Bank and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation) finally changed their stance/policy and agreed to accept the support from public institution of “Company Turnaround Aid Institution” on condition that Corporate Reorganization Act is to be adopted, after Mr. Maehara, Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism presented them with the government’s policy of supporting turnaround methodology of pre-package (coordinated beforehand).
And the government is to provide JAL of capital support, which was finalized as much as 1 trillion yen.
3. What is the business restructure framework/plan of JAL?
JAL is to accelerate developing revival action plan based on the following business restructure framework.
1) Apply Corporate Reorganization Act simultaneously with 2 affiliate business companies.
Apply for adoption of Corporate Reorganization Act simultaneously with JALI (Japan Air Lines International) and JAL Capital. The three companies will be integrated immediately after the application and other procedures for reorganization are complete and make back office etc. streamlined.
2) Request banks to support financing for refunding refinanced loans etc. that are to accrue from autumn 2010.
This is in addition to DBJ (Development Bank of Japan) is to loan 200 billion yen on January 15 in order to stop capital outflow from credit uncertainty of JAL. (With a rumour of delisting of JAL, JAL’s stock price had dropped drastically by 30 JPY from 37 JPY in a day, which recovered a little after the government announced the policy that shareholder special benefit plan and frequent flyer programme will be valid for a certain period after the application of the act).
After application of Corporate Reorganization Act、JAL is to gain bridge financing of total of 600 billion yen from the assisting organizations etc. And if the revival plan is approved, JAL is to request total of 50.6 billion yen to DBJ and the 3 major banks as capital used to refunding of refinanced loans of bridge financing. JAL also would like to raise capital of 21 billion yen in 5 years to purchase airplanes for the plan mentioned in 3) below.
3) Accelerate replacement of half the jumbo jet airplanes with smaller energy-saving airplanes.
By the end of 2012, JAL aims to own 46 jumbo jet planes, 76 middle size planes and 107 small size planes.
4) Reduce 53 affiliate companies from current 110 companies.
This includes selling out and/or liquidation of 24 affiliates.
5) Cut additional domestic and international flights, 25 in total.
13 international flights and 12 domestic flights will be additionally reduced.
6) Review of cargo flight business will include studying of closure
The operation deficit of cargo flight business is estimated to expand to 23.3 billion yen by the end of current fiscal year ending March 2010 and therefore is reviewed including option of closure of the business.
A part of affiliates that have domestic flights to isolated islands have already finalized its policy of terminating such business.
7) Cut 15,000 jobs.
This is equivalent to one-thirds of the total current employees.
8) Amortize pension liability of 100 billion yen over 5 years.
Since more than two-third of employees, retired and currently working, agreed to accept reduction in pension benefit, continuation of pension fund will be specified in the revival plan. Approximately 100 billion yen of serve for pension fund will be minus but JAL is to amortize over 5 years.
9) Turn back into black in 2011.
With drastic loss of passanges, revenue for current fiscal year is estimated to be 1.4 trillion yen, which is -27% from the previous year, with operation loss of 32.91 billion yen. However, with extreme restructuring, 2 years later (i.e. by the end of fiscal year ending March 2012), JAL aims to return to black by 23.4 billion yen and 3 years later by 85.2 billion yen.
4. Who will be driving the JAL turnaround?
Mr. Kazuo Inamori, founder and chairperson emeritus of Kyocera （77 year old）, was requested to be the new CEO of JAL from the government and Company Turnaround Aid Institution, and he accepted on January 13. Having reached advanced age and being responsible for other roles, he will be working 3 or 4 days a week with no rewards. He is expected to initiate restructuring and then the key coordinator with internal and external stakeholders. He will soon choose COO from short-listed internal candidates of 45-55 years old, to lead operation, supporting Mr. Inamoti.
Mr. Inamori has no experience in transportation business but was appointed with his management ability of having founded and made Kyocera into a global company, and entered telecommunication business by starting up another company (now KDDI）, himself balancing the two businesses to be successful in both.
Mr. Inamori has been supporting the DPJ long before it won the general election on August 30 2009 and has strong ties with key politician of the DPJ including Mr. Maehara, Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism and Mr. Ozawa, Secretary-General of the DPJ.
Some experts say that Mr. Inamori is the ideal person to drive the turnaround but some others say that he is not because he has no experience of turnaround. Mr. Inamori believes that turnaround is quite possible as long as the revival plan is executed steadily. The key for execution is clarification of CEO’s authority and responsibility, and supporting organization/environment. And last but not least, change in culture, and mindset and behaviour (action) of employees determine whether JAL will succeed in its turnaround.
2010年1月17日日曜日
2009年12月13日日曜日
With Slow Japanese Stock Market Recovery TSE to Revise Listing Regulation
Sunday, December 13, 2009 – Osaka, Japan
Today, Japan’s leading newspaper specialized in economy/business and politics, reported that Japan stock market is still in the plunge when stock prices are at high level worldwide. Japan is the only country whose stock price fluctuation ratio is minus since end of this August (timing of General Election) among 20 major countries and regions. This is said to attribute to high yen, increase in capital investment and investors avoiding to invest in Japan stock from suspiciousness on management of the economy by Hatoyama administration. The Nikkei Stock Average has recovered to over 10,000 yen after having once plunged to far below 9,000 yen at the lowest, but compared to other stock market, it is prominent that Japan stock price has not been recovering sufficiently.
1. Stock prices of countries and regions excluding Japan and Italy have been on the rise since September in line with worldwide economic recovery.
Since the General Election in end of August, The Nikkei Stock Average dropped by 3.7% as of December 11. It has once declined by 13.4% in the end of November due to drastic high yen. On the other hand, stock prices of other major countries have been firmly improving since September with bottom-out of worldwide economy. Italy’s stock price has remained almost constant since September but all others have been rising; +27% for Russia, over +20% for China and Brazil, and the U.S has been steadily improving with approximately +10%.
2. There are several reasons for plunge in Japan stock price.
The first reason is drastic high yen. Since Japan relies much on export-oriented industries, this has huge negative impact on the Japanese economy.
The second reason is many companies have been issuing many new stocks to increase capital and enormous amount of share of stock were supplied to the stock market, leading to dilution of outstanding stocks.
The third reason is uncertainty of government’s economic policy, leading to negative impact on market psychology. Immediate execution of countermeasures for deflation and high yen is critical but Hatoyama administration has other issues such as political donation and transfer of Futenma airbase, and some experts in economy are worried that the priority of economy under Hatoyama administration might be not so high. In addition, finalizing 2010 budget is taking time because the administration is having a tough time in reducing request of budget allocation. With this, on December 11, in bond market, long-term interest rate rose because of the laxing fiscal discipline, and in the stock market, many experts view that the Hatoyama administration has not yet developed long-term growth strategy.
3. Current situation needs to be improved immediately.
Under the severe current situation, Japan needs economic measure to be implemented immediately. Expectation of mid/long-term economic growth of Japan is shrinking among overseas investors. And with ongoing deflation as mentioned in the previous article "How Japan Get Out From 10 Year Deflation?", Japan’s GDP is at one of the lowest level in 19 years.
Under ongoing deflation situation, it would be difficult for companies to increase revenue and profit, and stock price tends to decrease as well. An expert in stock market comments that overseas investors are likely to avoid investing to countries that are going through deflation. And according to a survey executed by the U.S. Merrill Lynch in November, the percentage of investors who are timid to Japanese stocks was the highest since autumn of 2002.
Trading value for 2009 at the TSE (Tokyo Stock Exchange) is assumed to be at the lowest level in 5 years. Also, it is assumed that trading value of Shanghai Stock Exchange of China will be greater than that of TSE. Number of companies that newly listed this year in Japan is 19, which is the least in 31 years.
One of the few positive atmospherics is the fact that Japanese stocks on hand of investors seems to be less than usual. So when investors change their view and judgment on the administration’s management of the economy and/or exchange rate changes, big investors may increase again their Japanese stocks on hand, which would lead to improvement in Japan stock market.
However, in general, many experts view that for the time being, stock market prices will not improve so much because of the anxiety that the economy will plunge again with deflation.
With deteriorating cash flow of Japanese companies as reported in recent articles by Nikkei, it is natural that Japanese companies would need to raise capital and plunge in stock price would be a big negative factor for them. According to a Nikkei’s article of December 12, debt that Japanese companies have on UAE (general construction, trading etc.) of 66 billion yen (approximately 7.5 billion USD out of 15 billion USD) in total are still uncollected, as of December 11. Also, according to another Nikkei’s article of December 10, there is an anxiety that financial situation (especially consolidated cash flow and interest-bearing debt) of Japanese general construction companies, is deteriorating, attributing to factors such as big burden of reimbursed expenses of big overseas projects of UAE and Algeria.
4. TSE is to revise listing regulation to create an environment in which companies will be able to increase capital flexibly, with minimum negative impact on their shareholders.
According to another today’s article of Nikkei, TSE is to revise listing regulation to create an environment in which companies will be able to increase capital flexibly, with minimum negative impact on their shareholders. The objective of the revision is to enhance flexibility of raising capital and to activate plunging stock market.
Under the current environment, capital increased by public offering leads to drastic decrease in EPS (earnings per share), and current shareholders will gain loss from their stock. TSE will revise listing regulation by the end of the year so that companies can flexibly set capital increase and raise capital by allocating new share subscription right to their shareholders. This kind of method is called Right Issue in overseas stock market, and in Europe, this method is used to raise approximately 60% of total capital raised.
Today, Japan’s leading newspaper specialized in economy/business and politics, reported that Japan stock market is still in the plunge when stock prices are at high level worldwide. Japan is the only country whose stock price fluctuation ratio is minus since end of this August (timing of General Election) among 20 major countries and regions. This is said to attribute to high yen, increase in capital investment and investors avoiding to invest in Japan stock from suspiciousness on management of the economy by Hatoyama administration. The Nikkei Stock Average has recovered to over 10,000 yen after having once plunged to far below 9,000 yen at the lowest, but compared to other stock market, it is prominent that Japan stock price has not been recovering sufficiently.
1. Stock prices of countries and regions excluding Japan and Italy have been on the rise since September in line with worldwide economic recovery.
Since the General Election in end of August, The Nikkei Stock Average dropped by 3.7% as of December 11. It has once declined by 13.4% in the end of November due to drastic high yen. On the other hand, stock prices of other major countries have been firmly improving since September with bottom-out of worldwide economy. Italy’s stock price has remained almost constant since September but all others have been rising; +27% for Russia, over +20% for China and Brazil, and the U.S has been steadily improving with approximately +10%.
2. There are several reasons for plunge in Japan stock price.
The first reason is drastic high yen. Since Japan relies much on export-oriented industries, this has huge negative impact on the Japanese economy.
The second reason is many companies have been issuing many new stocks to increase capital and enormous amount of share of stock were supplied to the stock market, leading to dilution of outstanding stocks.
The third reason is uncertainty of government’s economic policy, leading to negative impact on market psychology. Immediate execution of countermeasures for deflation and high yen is critical but Hatoyama administration has other issues such as political donation and transfer of Futenma airbase, and some experts in economy are worried that the priority of economy under Hatoyama administration might be not so high. In addition, finalizing 2010 budget is taking time because the administration is having a tough time in reducing request of budget allocation. With this, on December 11, in bond market, long-term interest rate rose because of the laxing fiscal discipline, and in the stock market, many experts view that the Hatoyama administration has not yet developed long-term growth strategy.
3. Current situation needs to be improved immediately.
Under the severe current situation, Japan needs economic measure to be implemented immediately. Expectation of mid/long-term economic growth of Japan is shrinking among overseas investors. And with ongoing deflation as mentioned in the previous article "How Japan Get Out From 10 Year Deflation?", Japan’s GDP is at one of the lowest level in 19 years.
Under ongoing deflation situation, it would be difficult for companies to increase revenue and profit, and stock price tends to decrease as well. An expert in stock market comments that overseas investors are likely to avoid investing to countries that are going through deflation. And according to a survey executed by the U.S. Merrill Lynch in November, the percentage of investors who are timid to Japanese stocks was the highest since autumn of 2002.
Trading value for 2009 at the TSE (Tokyo Stock Exchange) is assumed to be at the lowest level in 5 years. Also, it is assumed that trading value of Shanghai Stock Exchange of China will be greater than that of TSE. Number of companies that newly listed this year in Japan is 19, which is the least in 31 years.
One of the few positive atmospherics is the fact that Japanese stocks on hand of investors seems to be less than usual. So when investors change their view and judgment on the administration’s management of the economy and/or exchange rate changes, big investors may increase again their Japanese stocks on hand, which would lead to improvement in Japan stock market.
However, in general, many experts view that for the time being, stock market prices will not improve so much because of the anxiety that the economy will plunge again with deflation.
With deteriorating cash flow of Japanese companies as reported in recent articles by Nikkei, it is natural that Japanese companies would need to raise capital and plunge in stock price would be a big negative factor for them. According to a Nikkei’s article of December 12, debt that Japanese companies have on UAE (general construction, trading etc.) of 66 billion yen (approximately 7.5 billion USD out of 15 billion USD) in total are still uncollected, as of December 11. Also, according to another Nikkei’s article of December 10, there is an anxiety that financial situation (especially consolidated cash flow and interest-bearing debt) of Japanese general construction companies, is deteriorating, attributing to factors such as big burden of reimbursed expenses of big overseas projects of UAE and Algeria.
4. TSE is to revise listing regulation to create an environment in which companies will be able to increase capital flexibly, with minimum negative impact on their shareholders.
According to another today’s article of Nikkei, TSE is to revise listing regulation to create an environment in which companies will be able to increase capital flexibly, with minimum negative impact on their shareholders. The objective of the revision is to enhance flexibility of raising capital and to activate plunging stock market.
Under the current environment, capital increased by public offering leads to drastic decrease in EPS (earnings per share), and current shareholders will gain loss from their stock. TSE will revise listing regulation by the end of the year so that companies can flexibly set capital increase and raise capital by allocating new share subscription right to their shareholders. This kind of method is called Right Issue in overseas stock market, and in Europe, this method is used to raise approximately 60% of total capital raised.
2009年10月25日日曜日
JAL to be GM of Japan – Turnaround under Government’s Control
October 25, 2009 – Osaka, Japan
Today Nikkei, Japan’s leading newspaper specialized in economy and politics, reported that on October 24, the Japanese government finalized the policy of aiding turnaround of JAL (Japan Air Lines) by making JAL leverage public institution of “Company Turnaround Aid Institution”. Related ministers will discuss this issue and officially announce the policy by the end of this month, with the objective of reducing excess debt under the government’s control and develop drastic restructuring plan. The institution will execute bridge financing etc. to abolish credit uneasiness of JAL. The government will wait for the restructuring plan then study increase capital by public funding as a last resort. More drastic solution is to be studied and developed for pension debt reduction which is currently very slow in progress. Restructuring plan development under strong government’s control is to start at last.
According to Nikkei, the outlook of the JAL turnaround is as below.
Capital increase: Current restructuring plan is 300 billon yen including public funding. The government’s policy includes leveraging Company Turnaround Aid Institution to insert capital by the end of 2009.
Debt write-off: Current plan is 220 billion yen. The government’s policy is to convincing syndicates of banks to accept debt write-offs, on condition that JAL will drastically restructure with public funding.
Debt-for-equity swap: Current plan is 30 billion yen. The government’s policy is to convincing syndicates of banks to accept debt-for-equity swap, on condition that JAL will drastically restructure with public funding.
Bridge financing: Current plan is 200 billion yen. The government’s policy is to execute this by the end of November 2009.
Pension debt reduction: Current plan is reducing insufficient accumulation to 100 billion yen from 330 billion yen. The government’s policy is change to more drastic plan.
Restructuring: Current plan includes cutting almost 9000 jobs and abolishing 45-50 routes by 2014.
Capital deficit: Current estimation is up to 270 billion yen.
JAL’s turnaround has been going through a trial and error process as below.
June 30: 100 billion yen financing agreement with Development Bank of Japan etc. froze.
August 7: April-June consolidated financial result was in red by 99 billion yen.
August 21: Starting negotiation of integrating air cargo business with NYK (Nippon Yusen Kaisha) Line.
Beginning of September: Alliance negotiation with Delta and American Airlines including financing came to light.
September 15: Draft of management improvement plan with pillars of cutting 68000 jobs and abolishing total of domestic and international 50 routes proposed at blue-ribbon panel.
September 25: A task force directly controlled by Mr. Maehara, Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism established, marking the start of reviewing the current turnaround plan.
October 13: The task force proposed a turnaround plan draft to financial institutes etc. requesting them to accept debt write-offs of 300 billion yen in total.
October 20: The task force made the revised draft including increase of capital of 300 billion yen by public funding etc.
The Japanese government finalized the policy of aiding turnaround of JAL (Japan Air Lines) by making JAL leverage public funding by Company Turnaround Aid Institution because of the tough reality that they would not be able to win understanding and support from syndicates of banks without strong control and interference from the government. Under a situation of extreme funding difficulties, the government decided to back-up in full scale. Hatoyama administration cannot fail this turnaround with wall at their back; as Mr. Maehara states, we cannot have a situation in which we do not have flights and allow inconvenience to travellers. However, there are many hurdles and obstacles to overcome and the outlook is not necessarily bright.
The turnaround is not only about financing and debt write-offs. It is really all about whether the mindset of current JAL employees and retired workers, and the whether the system and culture of the entire company change from the current “the government will foot the bill” culture. It is only when the company totally change from inside to an organization that it will start creating value to generate revenue with optimum cost so that financing/cash flow management will be a sound one.
Today Nikkei, Japan’s leading newspaper specialized in economy and politics, reported that on October 24, the Japanese government finalized the policy of aiding turnaround of JAL (Japan Air Lines) by making JAL leverage public institution of “Company Turnaround Aid Institution”. Related ministers will discuss this issue and officially announce the policy by the end of this month, with the objective of reducing excess debt under the government’s control and develop drastic restructuring plan. The institution will execute bridge financing etc. to abolish credit uneasiness of JAL. The government will wait for the restructuring plan then study increase capital by public funding as a last resort. More drastic solution is to be studied and developed for pension debt reduction which is currently very slow in progress. Restructuring plan development under strong government’s control is to start at last.
According to Nikkei, the outlook of the JAL turnaround is as below.
Capital increase: Current restructuring plan is 300 billon yen including public funding. The government’s policy includes leveraging Company Turnaround Aid Institution to insert capital by the end of 2009.
Debt write-off: Current plan is 220 billion yen. The government’s policy is to convincing syndicates of banks to accept debt write-offs, on condition that JAL will drastically restructure with public funding.
Debt-for-equity swap: Current plan is 30 billion yen. The government’s policy is to convincing syndicates of banks to accept debt-for-equity swap, on condition that JAL will drastically restructure with public funding.
Bridge financing: Current plan is 200 billion yen. The government’s policy is to execute this by the end of November 2009.
Pension debt reduction: Current plan is reducing insufficient accumulation to 100 billion yen from 330 billion yen. The government’s policy is change to more drastic plan.
Restructuring: Current plan includes cutting almost 9000 jobs and abolishing 45-50 routes by 2014.
Capital deficit: Current estimation is up to 270 billion yen.
JAL’s turnaround has been going through a trial and error process as below.
June 30: 100 billion yen financing agreement with Development Bank of Japan etc. froze.
August 7: April-June consolidated financial result was in red by 99 billion yen.
August 21: Starting negotiation of integrating air cargo business with NYK (Nippon Yusen Kaisha) Line.
Beginning of September: Alliance negotiation with Delta and American Airlines including financing came to light.
September 15: Draft of management improvement plan with pillars of cutting 68000 jobs and abolishing total of domestic and international 50 routes proposed at blue-ribbon panel.
September 25: A task force directly controlled by Mr. Maehara, Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism established, marking the start of reviewing the current turnaround plan.
October 13: The task force proposed a turnaround plan draft to financial institutes etc. requesting them to accept debt write-offs of 300 billion yen in total.
October 20: The task force made the revised draft including increase of capital of 300 billion yen by public funding etc.
The Japanese government finalized the policy of aiding turnaround of JAL (Japan Air Lines) by making JAL leverage public funding by Company Turnaround Aid Institution because of the tough reality that they would not be able to win understanding and support from syndicates of banks without strong control and interference from the government. Under a situation of extreme funding difficulties, the government decided to back-up in full scale. Hatoyama administration cannot fail this turnaround with wall at their back; as Mr. Maehara states, we cannot have a situation in which we do not have flights and allow inconvenience to travellers. However, there are many hurdles and obstacles to overcome and the outlook is not necessarily bright.
The turnaround is not only about financing and debt write-offs. It is really all about whether the mindset of current JAL employees and retired workers, and the whether the system and culture of the entire company change from the current “the government will foot the bill” culture. It is only when the company totally change from inside to an organization that it will start creating value to generate revenue with optimum cost so that financing/cash flow management will be a sound one.
登録:
投稿 (Atom)